Everyone sees differently

You have said many times that the principle in theater is practice for us. Theater happens with the presence of the audience.

Execution is a stage of practice. The audience is added to the practice in the performance.

What happens if a rehearsal is not staged?

The experience is incomplete at the last stage.

Let's put aside compliments, Jalal! How correct do you think you were in choosing your actors?

I will start from the beginning with a theory; That any actor can play any role. This theory is correct, but this thing about an actor may take 50 or 500 years! But as for my shows, they have mostly been the first and last choices, so it is not possible for me to compare.

Today's top joke is Kundra, it's Vonnegut. I don't think that what passes as a joke in black play is very close to becoming theater. It is a joke with big implications that shapes the main event. I think that part of what makes the professional and non-professional audience leave the Absurd is their wrong understanding of the Theater of the Absurd and their lack of understanding of the story of single cells. Enthusiasts think that absurdity is talking nonsense, and the same thing is happening here, so he eases himself and says only one word in the most technical way possible: absurdity.

Here, we have always been involved in the form and name and such statements!

First, I ask about stillness and movement from a morphological point of view...

Stillness, is not bad in itself and both are necessary together. In rehearsals, we have set the principle that we should not move on stage unless there is a logic and reason for the movement.

What specific philosophical view does the stillness in the soup eating episode exaggerate?

It is stupidity and passivity of these people.

These two people are decision makers for freedom in its general philosophical sense for Salem and Salar and Piri and Lari.

We see an instinctive intelligence under the stupidity of these two, and they teach us gradually with stupidity, and we will be surprised if they don't show any stupidity. The fact that these are above does not mean their judgment, but we see their perception and understanding of the lower worlds.

These worlds are separated from each other at first and gradually overlap and intersect, in movements, lights, stories and...

This interference is gradually created in this world. We have three times and three different worlds here.

You are constantly looking for contradictions in the shapes and images of people of every world, sub-narratives and philosophies.

Yes, the people of each of these worlds constantly make fun of both their own components and the other worlds.

In complete nothingness, we have four people with a "Bala" above them, and another pair is sitting. We see all concepts from freedom and captivity to... side by side, in a cell, around the world, in a microscope, etc.

It is not simple; Everyone sees it different; I try to express what I see honestly, but I don't think in a particular way. I see man as a prisoner of questions that he tries to solve every moment consciously and unconsciously, and this person will be different depending on the type of path he chooses to find the answers to his questions. This flow is not very fancy; You can look at it completely realistically.

Roozbeh Hosseini